Locked Out of Opportunity: The Quiet Trap of Corporate Non-Competes
- Alex Pyatkovsky

- Jun 21
- 3 min read

Let’s be honest: there’s nothing quite like the bittersweet moment of leaving a job. You hand in your resignation, maybe after months of soul-searching. You’re ready for a fresh start, a new challenge, a chance to grow.
And then HR slides over a folder, gives you a polite smile, and says,
“Just a reminder—you signed a non-compete.”
And suddenly your fresh start feels like a courtroom drama where you’re the defendant… and your crime is having ambition.
We don’t talk about it enough, but non-competes have quietly become one of the most suffocating mechanisms in corporate America.
The idea sounds simple on paper: “Don’t take what you learned here and give it to our direct competitors.” Reasonable, right? In theory, sure. But in practice? It’s rarely about protecting trade secrets and often about protecting control.
And the terms?
So vague, so broad, they may as well say:
“Thou shalt not use the skills you spent your life building.”
Take a copywriter who wants to move to another agency, a marketer wanting to shift from tech to healthcare, or a sales professional who wants to stay in their field but change zip codes. Suddenly, they’re told they can’t work at any company vaguely similar to the one they just left—for 6 months, 12 months, 2 years, or longer.
Oh—and sometimes it’s not even just competitors.
It’s companies “that could become competitors.”
It’s roles “similar in nature to the one previously held.”
It’s the entire industry.
Because, you know, heaven forbid someone with talent and experience… continues using it.
Let’s step back and call it what it is: a way to scare people into staying put.
It’s less about protecting the company and more about protecting the illusion that they can keep you boxed in, even after you leave.
And here’s the cruel irony:
The same companies that enforce non-competes are often the ones laying people off at scale.
You can be shown the door in a Zoom call with 30 seconds of small talk—and still be told, “Oh, by the way, don’t go work anywhere else.”
You can’t have it both ways.
You can’t say, “We’re all about employee growth,” and then legally block someone from growing anywhere else.
Let’s also not ignore who this hurts most:
Not the C-suite execs with lawyers on speed dial.
It hurts mid-career professionals, single parents, new grads, people in transition.
People who just need to work.
And now they’re being told their options are legally limited because they once had a login and a name badge.
So what do we do?
First, we speak up. We normalize pushing back. We call out companies that use non-competes as leashes instead of legal safeguards.
Second, we support legislation that makes it harder to enforce these contracts unfairly. The FTC has already proposed limits—and it’s long overdue.
Third, if you’re in a position of influence—don’t require them. Build a culture people don’t want to leave instead of trying to trap them when they do.
At the end of the day, a company that’s afraid of competition isn’t strong—it’s scared.
Here’s the truth:
Your career doesn’t belong to a company.
Your ideas, your growth, your passion—they’re yours.
And if someone tells you you’re not allowed to take those things somewhere new?
That’s not protection.
That’s possession.
We were never meant to stay stuck.
And no contract should be stronger than your calling.






Comments